new film with Gandolfini in it?" (I've seen it, but haven't reviewed because I haven't had the opportunity to see it a second time) and "Why have they ruined Perks by changing Sam into Hermione?"
The Perks of Being A Wallflower, the novel, was apparently a big hit with teens and adults, and it should hopefully come as some solace for readers that the film is written and directed by the author, Stephen Chbosky. Despite having not read the book myself, I'd still imagine that means it's faithfully adapted. In the early 1990s, Charlie is a deeply troubled teen who's just starting his freshman year at high school. He looks set to bury his head in classic literature, and remain alienated from his schoolmates, until his imagination is captured by step-siblings Patrick, a flamboyant performer who, in another, less kind world, might have taken up archery, and Sam, who is, mercifully, not the kind of Manic Pixie Dream Girl that populates lesser films than this.
You can practically hear the sound of a million eyes rolling when you describe this film. Near the beginning, Sam actually delivers the line, "Oh my God, I love The Smiths" in earnest. Whether or not the hipsters have appropriated it in pop culture, it remains that the film is otherwise relatively unburdened by the cringe-inducing mumble tropes, instead pitching itself as a well-written and well-acted teen movie that does exactly what it intends for its audience, by dramatising the struggles that seem important at their age. For those outside of the intended audience, it slowly emerges that the protagonist's troubles are rather more disturbing than most of the intended audience may share.
It's a far more canny use of exposition than many teen-oriented movies might have gone for, similar to how it actually took half an hour of mixtapes being exchanged on cassettes before I twigged that the film wasn't set in the present, but in the 1990s. The pay-off to Charlie's problems (which I wouldn't dream of spoiling here) isn't played as some schlocky plot twist, but as a development that gave context to any of my earlier quibbles. Like ParaNorman, it's a movie about understanding and tolerance that brings you in on the journey of the characters, to spellbinding effect. Logan Lerman is well suited to the lead role- he never plays Charlie as devoid of personality, but simply repressed enough that the freedom he discovers is rapturous.
The cast of characters that liberates him are very enjoyable to be around too, particularly Patrick and Sam. As Patrick, Ezra Miller is a world away from We Need To Talk About Kevin, with a story arc that avoids more obvious developments and comes to an entirely satisfying resolution, and equal aptitude with both the comic relief and the serious stuff. Emma Watson's American accent grates in the very first scene in which she appears, but, strangely, never afterwards. Either it only didn't work in that first scene, or it's easier to get used to than a typical bad movie accent, but irrespective of this, Sam provides Watson with her least eventful cinematic school year ever, and she seems to relish the chance to show off more range than ever before.
The Perks of Being A Wallflower is now showing in cinemas nationwide.
If you've seen The Perks of Being A Wallflower, why
not share your comments below? If you've read the book, I'd like to hear about how you think this measures up...
I'm Mark the mad prophet, and until next time, don't watch anything I wouldn't watch.